It can expose inconsistent public facts
UsefulExamples include a payment sent to the wrong destination, no increase in the bridge vault, a mint without a verified source deposit, duplicate source hashes, or liabilities exceeding reserves.
XRPL defensive monitoring · local-first working preview
XRBC Bridge Integrity ToolsCheck whether a claimed bridge deposit actually reached the correct XRP Ledger vault, whether the destination chain created the matching amount, and whether verified reserves still cover bridge liabilities. The page also screens public bridge code for missing safeguards and creates a locally hashed evidence record.
Plain-language rule: a bridge should never create spendable value on another chain unless the matching value was independently verified on the source chain.
This preview performs defensive local analysis. It does not control a bridge, move funds, prove criminal intent, replace a professional security audit, or guarantee that every vulnerability will be found.
Free public safety directory · reusable XRBC gate for advanced tools
Anyone can browse listed bridges, status colors, known incidents, vault addresses, contracts, review dates, and source links without a wallet. A connected wallet holding at least 10 XRBC unlocks custom bridge profiles, technical scans, deposit analysis, reconciliation, evidence exports, and bridge-review submission files.
Reusable participation gate
XRBC remains in the wallet. This page does not transfer, lock, burn, escrow, consume, or take custody of the tokens.
Connect Xaman to verify the reusable 10 XRBC balance requirement. Public bridge safety information remains available without connecting.
Free public bridge research is active. Wallet connection is optional and creates no XRPL transaction.
Use every bridge at your own risk. Green, yellow, and red labels are research classifications—not guarantees, endorsements, legal findings, or predictions. Bridge software, operators, contracts, addresses, and status can change after the directory was reviewed.
XRBitcoinCash does not operate the listed bridges and is not responsible for losses, failed transfers, malicious interfaces, incorrect third-party data, delayed updates, or decisions made from this monitor.
Current review state
These values update as the local checks are completed.
Seven-stage bridge integrity workspace
Use Beginner mode for plain explanations, Guided mode for the recommended workflow, or Expert mode for full technical fields.
Public safety access stays open: the monitored bridge directory, status colors, incident warnings, addresses, contracts, and supporting sources do not require a wallet. Controls that create custom profiles, run technical analysis, export evidence, or prepare bridge submissions require the reusable 10 XRBC gate.
Persistent local workspace: entries, findings, and evidence are saved in this browser. Download Project creates a portable JSON backup. The page does not require a wallet. Directory refresh requests only the public JSON sources named above.
Stage 1
Tell the monitor which account should receive funds and which chain should create the matching representation.
New bridge review submission: verified advanced users can prepare a structured JSON submission for a new bridge or a correction to an existing record. This beta creates a local submission file; it does not publish or change a directory classification automatically.
Stage 2
Independent data sources reduce the chance that one unavailable or dishonest service controls the result.
This preview checks structure only. It does not contact the entered servers. Live endpoint health, TLS details, ledger agreement, rate limits, and response signatures should be tested by the future backend.
Stage 3
These are the facts that must be true before a transaction is accepted as a bridge deposit.
Recommended behavior: a missing fact should produce “unknown” or “blocked,” never a favorable score.
Stage 4
Paste a relevant relayer or witness function. The page looks for important validation concepts and highlights what appears absent.
Stage 5
Paste a transaction and its metadata, or use the demonstrations to see a valid deposit and a phantom deposit.
Stage 6
Match the verified XRPL deposit to the destination event and confirm that total reserves cover all bridge obligations.
Stage 7
The complete local project is canonicalized and hashed with SHA-256. The evidence pack is not uploaded by this page.
No evidence pack has been generated.
Important boundaries
Examples include a payment sent to the wrong destination, no increase in the bridge vault, a mint without a verified source deposit, duplicate source hashes, or liabilities exceeding reserves.
A missing check may result from negligence, misunderstanding, poor testing, unsafe design, or deliberate conduct. Intent requires evidence beyond a local code screen.
Production monitoring should compare signed build hashes, image digests, contract versions, signer lists, and relayer attestations with the reviewed source.
Unavailable metadata, endpoint disagreement, unverified supply, or an unreadable contract state should remain unknown or blocked rather than being converted into a favorable score.
Local audit trail
The log records local actions taken during this browser session and saved project.
Optional advanced-tool verification
Xaman will identify the selected XRP Ledger account. The page will then read that account's XRBC trust-line balance from two independent public XRPL servers using validated ledger data.
No payment or signature request: this step does not transfer XRP or XRBC, create a trust line, connect to a third-party bridge, or authorize a bridge transaction.
Future bridge interactions remain separate and risky. Never approve a bridge transaction unless the destination, asset, amount, contract, network, and current operator status have been independently verified.